Distributed Monolith: Understanding the distributed monolith is a term used to describe software systems that, despite being distributed across multiple servers or services, behave like a monolithic application. This architectural pattern often emerges when teams attempt to transition to microservices without fully embracing the principles of decoupling and independence. The result is a system with the complexity of a distributed system but the constraints of a monolith.
—
Characteristics of a Distributed Monolith
1. Tight Coupling Between Services
Despite being deployed as separate services, the components rely heavily on each other, often requiring synchronous communication for functionality.
2. Shared Databases
A distributed monolith frequently uses a single, shared database, leading to dependencies that prevent independent scaling or deployment of services.
3. Synchronous Communication
Services communicate synchronously, making them interdependent and reducing the system’s fault tolerance.
4. Centralized Deployment
Changes to one service often require updates to others, resulting in a centralized deployment model similar to a monolith.
—
Challenges of Distributed Monoliths
1. Scalability Limitations
Since services are tightly coupled, scaling one service might require scaling the entire system, negating the benefits of a microservices architecture.
2. High Latency
Synchronous communication between services can introduce latency and reduce system performance, especially under heavy load.
3. Complexity in Testing and Deployment
Shared codebases and dependencies make testing and deploying changes more challenging, leading to longer release cycles.
4. Single Point of Failure
A failure in one service can cascade, affecting the entire system, similar to a traditional monolith.
—
Code Example: Synchronous Communication Pitfall
# Service A calling Service B synchronously
import requests
def get_user_data(user_id):
response = requests.get(f”http://service-b/api/users/{user_id}”)
if response.status_code == 200:
return response.json()
else:
raise Exception(“Service B is unavailable.”)
The above code demonstrates how Service A depends on Service B, creating a tightly coupled system prone to cascading failures.
—
Transitioning Away from a Distributed Monolith
1. Decouple Services
Refactor services to communicate asynchronously using message queues like RabbitMQ or Kafka.
2. Database Per Service
Adopt a database-per-service model to reduce interdependencies.
3. Implement Circuit Breakers
Use libraries like Hystrix to handle service failures gracefully.
4. Adopt Domain-Driven Design
Focus on creating bounded contexts for services to reduce coupling and improve independence.
—
Schematic: Distributed Monolith vs. True Microservices
Distributed Monolith
Shared database → Synchronous communication → Centralized deployment
Microservices
Independent databases → Asynchronous communication → Independent deployment
—
Conclusion
The distributed monolith is a cautionary tale for organizations transitioning to microservices. While it may seem like an intermediate step, the drawbacks often outweigh the benefits. Embracing microservices principles fully is essential to unlock the true potential of distributed systems.
The article above is rendered by integrating outputs of 1 HUMAN AGENT & 3 AI AGENTS, an amalgamation of HGI and AI to serve technology education globally.